Student Learning in a Collaborative Classroom

North Seattle CC 3-year Study of Coordinated Studies Program

Final Report


Jim Harnish, NSCC faculty


Background

"Learning Communities" has become a national umbrella term which includes a variety of institutional models often associated with students' academic experience related to retention projects or freshman orientation activities. Many studies, including our own, have documented the positive impact of "learning communities" on retention and persistence. At our institution, where there is a requirement for learning communities, we were also interested in discovering whether Coordinated Studies, a learning community model which emphasizes collaborative teaching and learning, produces learning outcomes different than those achieved in other courses and also what is in the structure of this model that contributes to student achievement.

Sample Coordinated Studies Syllabus

"Seminar process encourages us to learn... everything there is to know about this world" (Click on Image to hear more)
"Seminar process encourages us to learn... everything there is to know about this world" (Click on Image to hear more)


Institutional Impact

1. Revision of AA Degree

This study helped faculty come to consensus on the essential curriculum and pedagogical elements that lead to outcomes not usually the focus of stand-alone courses and therefore justify an Integrated Studies AA degree requirement.

The revised description for the Integrated Studies now reads:

Integrated Studies is a collaborative teaching and learning mode which explores questions, problems, or issues too broad to be adequately studied within a single discipline, and which aims at a complex understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of knowledge.

Student Learning Outcomes

  • Discover the interdisciplinary nature of knowledge
  • Integrate sources from multiple fields and viewpoints
  • Work in a collaborative teaching and learning environment
  • Synthesize and evaluate new understandings and knowledge
  • 2. Introduction to college-wide initiative for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

  • Faculty SoTL orientation for 85 faculty (Dec, 2003)
  • Seven Research Projects funded (03-04)
  • Human Subject Review Board established
  • Major component of college Assessment Program (04-05)
  • 3. Campus joined Carnegie Cluster Program "Sustaining Student Voices"

  • Faculty/student team attended Carnegie Colloquium
  • Students engaged in research projects
  • Representation at AAHE/Carnegie Summer Academy
  • Revised Requirement

    Report on Campus SoTL Initiative

    Human Subjects Review Board Website

    NSCC SoTL Webpage

    Carnegie Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

    Project Summary

    Jim Harnish

    Carnegie Scholar, 2003-04

    My research project began as an assessment project to document whether our interdisciplinary Coordinated Studies curriculum ("Learning Communities") produced positive results not only in terms of student retention, persistence, and graduation rates but also in terms of student learning. What emerged were some insights not only into the impact of this curriculum on student progress and development but also the identification of curricular and pedagogical practices that seem to be related to these results.


    Methodology

    Analyzed more than 600 student questionnaires from 23 different courses taught by 27 faculty from 11 disciplines over three years.

    Reviewed insights from two student focus groups with 15 students from seven different Coordinated Studies.

    Gathered 5 years of institutional data related to student success indicators of retention, persistence and graduation rates.

    Copy of Questionnaire

    Totals in Order

    Categories/codes for responses

    Total/percentage by category

    Notes from Focus Group

    Institutional Data

    83% course completion

    87% persistence to next quarter

    54% degree completion

    Student Satisfaction

    87% glad they enrolled

    92% positive learning outcomes

    80% support for AA-degree requirement

    8% of comments express concerns

    Student Satisfaction and Concerns


    Student Concerns

    (238 comments of 2930 total)

  • Scheduling problems
  • Not enough depth
  • Too much work
  • General negative (I didn't like it)
  • Grading method
  • Other (Particular course concerns)
  • Roadblock to transfer
  • Not different than stand-alone
  • Prefer stand-alones
  • Multiple faculty
  • Analysis of Concerns

    Next Steps

    Future research projects

  • Seminar Skills (video)
  • General Education outcomes
  • Examination of student work
  • Impact of collaboarative team teaching on faculty
  • Linked courses


  • NSCC collaborative teaching team


    "Faculty created a learning community... gave up Freire's banking model" (Click on image to hear more)
    "Faculty created a learning community... gave up Freire's banking model" (Click on image to hear more)


    Students Identify Differences

    (Between Coordinated Studies and Stand-alone classes)

  • Focus on interdisciplinary nature of knowledge
  • Change of faculty role with multiple teachers
  • Emphasis on seminars
  • Emphasis on teaching academic skills
  • Creation of collaborative learning culture
  • Scheduling of longer class periods
  • Key curriculum design elements

    What's in a Seminar Handout

    "Seminar allowed me to connect with the class...to step outside my box" (Click on image to hear more)
    "Seminar allowed me to connect with the class...to step outside my box" (Click on image to hear more)


    Student Perceptions of What They Learned

    (Number of comments related to each category)

  • Academic Skills (201)
  • Critical Thinking (154)
  • Learned to interact, listen to, and understand others (124)
  • Developed new knowledge, more depth (119)
  • Learned how to learn from others, made friends (116)
  • Became open-minded, accepting new ideas/others (106)
  • Developed skills for employment/life (105)
  • Developed more confidence as learner (105)
  • Discovered interconnected nature of knowledge (102)
  • Developed insights into self (94)
  • Developed new attitudes, awareness, contemporary issues (90)
  • Easier to learn, more effective more motivated (84)
  • Creation of "Public Home Space"

    Bibliography

    Contact [email protected]

    Smith, Barbara Leigh, Jean MacGregor, Roberta Matthews, Faith Gabelnick, Learning Communities: Reforming Undergraduate Education. Jossey-Bass, 2004.

    MacGregor, Jean, Editor. Doing Learning Community Assessment: Five Campus Stories. National Learning Communities Project Monography Series. Olympia, WA: The Evergreen State College, Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education, in coooperation with the American Association for Higher Education.

    Perry, William G. Forms of Ethical and Intellectual Development in the College Years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.

    Taylor, K., B. Moore, J MacGregor, and J. Lindblad. 2003. Learning Community Research: What We know Now. National Learning Communities Project Monograph Series. Olympia, WA: The Evergreen State College, Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education, in coopoeration with the American Association for Higher Education.

    Wilkie, Gail. "Learning Community Enrollement Study, 1986-90." North Seattle Community College

    Moore, Diane and S. Kerlin. "Research Report: Examining Effectivenesss of Coordinated Studies, 1990-94." North Seattle Community College.


    This electronic portfolio was created using the KML Snapshot Tool™, a part of the KEEP Toolkit™,
    developed at the Knowledge Media Lab of The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
    Terms of Use - Privacy Policy